翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Redline darter
・ Redline Networks
・ Redline pufferfish
・ Redline Racer
・ Redline Racing
・ Redline Records
・ Redline Time Attack
・ Redling Fine Art
・ Redlingfield
・ Redlingfield Priory
・ Redlining
・ Redlino
・ Redliny
・ Redlip shiner
・ Redistricting commission
Redistricting in Arizona
・ Redistricting in California
・ Redistricting in Pennsylvania
・ Reditux
・ Rediu
・ Rediu River (Albuia)
・ Rediu River (Bahlui)
・ Rediu River (Bahluieț)
・ Rediu River (Bârlad)
・ Rediu, Galați
・ Rediu, Iași
・ Rediu, Neamț
・ Rediul Mare
・ ReDiviDeR
・ Rediviva


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Redistricting in Arizona : ウィキペディア英語版
Redistricting in Arizona

The U.S. state of Arizona must redraw its congressional and legislative districts every ten years to reflect changes in the state and national populations. Redistricting normally follows the completion of the United States Census, which is carried out by the federal government in years that end in 0; the most recent Census took place in 2010. Historically, Arizona's legislature has had control over the redistricting process. However, Proposition 106, passed in 2000, delegated the power to draw congressional and legislative boundaries to a bipartisan independent commission. The Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC) comprises two Democrats, two Republicans, and one independent chair. County and local redistricting, which normally takes place along the same timeline as congressional and legislative redistricting, is carried out by the individual county and local governments rather than the AIRC.
== Background ==

Reapportionment of representatives between the states every ten years based on new census figures is required by Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html )〕 The Constitution, Supreme Court jurisprudence and federal law allow significant latitude to the individual states to draw their congressional and legislative districts as they see fit, as long as each district contains roughly equivalent numbers of people (see ''Baker v. Carr'', ''Wesberry v. Sanders'', and ''Reynolds v. Sims'') and provides for minority representation pursuant to the Voting Rights Act. While control over redrawing district lines has been in the hands of state legislators for most of American history, a number of states, including Arizona, have adopted independent or bipartisan commissions for redistricting purposes in the last twenty years.
The entire state of Arizona was a covered jurisdiction under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, meaning that any change in voting requirements or procedures must be approved by either the U.S. Department of Justice or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia before taking effect. At the end of the redistricting process, the state had to submit its maps and demonstrate "that the proposed voting change does not deny or abridge the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group," the latter primarily referring to, in the case of Arizona, non-Anglophone Hispanics.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/vot/sec_5/covered.php )〕 The formula for Section 5 was struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. ___ (2013).〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-96_6k47.pdf )〕 Additionally, the proposed boundaries may not have a retrogressive effect on the ability of minority groups to elect "their preferred candidates of choice."

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Redistricting in Arizona」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.